Blog

With a variety of cutting technologies available today, each with its own unique strengths for materials like sheet metal, tubes, or profiles, the choice can be overwhelming. Some methods rely on mechanical abrasion, while others use thermal processes.

Recent advancements in fiber laser technology have intensified competition among high-definition plasma, CO2 laser, and fiber laser cutting methods. So, how do you decide which is most cost-effective, accurate, or best suited for different materials and thicknesses? Here, we break down the characteristics of each method to help you select the one that meets your specific needs.

Waterjet Cutting

Waterjet technology is ideal for materials that may be damaged by heat, such as plastics, coated materials, or cement panels, as it uses cold cutting methods. Adding an abrasive component can enhance its cutting power, making it suitable for tough materials like steel over 300 mm thick, as well as ceramics, stone, and glass.

Punch Cutting

While laser cutting has become popular, punch cutting still holds a place for specific applications due to its lower machine costs, high speed, and ability to perform unique operations like tapping and forming, which aren’t feasible with laser.

Oxyfuel Cutting

Oxyfuel cutting is most effective for thick carbon steel (above 75 mm), though it’s unsuitable for stainless steel and aluminum. It’s highly portable since it doesn’t require special electrical setups and has a low initial investment cost.

Plasma Cutting

High-definition plasma rivals laser quality on thicker materials but at a lower cost. It’s ideal for thicknesses starting from 5 mm, excelling around 30 mm—where laser technology falls short—and can handle up to 90 mm on carbon steel and 160 mm on stainless steel. Plasma also works well with ferrous and non-ferrous materials, and even oxidized or painted surfaces, making it versatile for various applications, including bevel cuts.

CO2 Laser Cutting

Laser technology generally offers superior precision, especially for thinner materials and small-diameter holes. CO2 lasers perform well on materials between 5 mm and 30 mm thick, achieving high levels of accuracy.

Fiber Laser Cutting

Fiber laser has emerged as a highly efficient technology, delivering the precision and speed of traditional CO2 laser cutting, especially for thicknesses under 5 mm. Known for its cost-effectiveness and energy efficiency, fiber laser cutting has also gained popularity due to decreasing machine prices. It’s particularly effective with reflective materials, such as copper and brass, positioning fiber laser as an eco-friendly choice that is leading the market.

Choosing the Right Technology for Your Needs

In cases where multiple cutting technologies could achieve the desired results, how can production be optimized? The first step is to consider various machining options according to the chosen technology. Each part may require specific machining processes tailored to the equipment, ensuring optimal use of resources while achieving desired cutting quality.

Sometimes, only one technology may be suitable for a particular part, requiring a system that applies advanced logic to determine the best manufacturing route based on factors like material type, thickness, quality requirements, or hole diameters. This analysis helps identify the most appropriate machine to produce the part based on its physical and geometric properties.

Additionally, if the primary machine is unavailable or overloaded, software with load management and work queue allocation can select an alternative method or machine to complete the job on time. This flexibility reduces idle times and enhances overall manufacturing efficiency, even allowing for subcontracting if necessary.

In summary, selecting and integrating the right cutting technology for each specific case requires a comprehensive CAD/CAM software solution that can coordinate various machines and technologies within a single system. The software should assign the optimal machine, balance workloads, and ensure production meets quality, cost-efficiency, and delivery goals.